It turns out that the goals are set by adults, and their children are realizing.
As you can see, our life is interesting.
You said that the students of the faculty not only study, but also work, write articles and even books, and participate in the implementation of various projects. Why, in your opinion, is it important for them?
Undergraduate and graduate studies at a faculty like ours are not only theory, they are a product of creativity in various directions. Whoever succeeds in what is trying to realize himself.
We provide students with such opportunities, involve them in various types of activities – both profession-related and volunteer.
Flyers, videos, advertising product, books, articles – they do all this during their studies, and this is also an important part of student life.
There is an educational portal where the best works are presented, we maintain a page in the Moskovsky Komsomolets newspaper in Crimea, we hold exhibitions of various formats, we participate in various events, and are engaged in charitable activities.
I really want our guys to be caring people, to be able to help others and, of course, so that they can and want to learn.
We are ready to provide them with all the conditions, but a lot depends on them. I always remind students of one proverb: “A horse can be brought to a watering place, but it must drink itself.” And this is really so: nothing will be decided by itself, the fate and future of a person depend on him.
Skeptics believe that distance education does not provide knowledge to the same extent as classical, classroom …
This is a very controversial issue. I believe that everything is very individual: if a person wants to get an education, he will work on it, regardless of where he is – in the classroom or on a distance course.
Today’s students are very attentive, demanding, practically oriented
And, by the way, distance education for modern students is beneficial and interesting: they can choose courses in other universities, listen to the best teachers.
Have the students themselves changed?
Undoubtedly. Today’s students are very attentive, demanding, practically oriented. They know where they would like to work and what to do, they clearly understand that education is the same commodity as everything else, and therefore require high-quality training. The requirements for teachers have also seriously increased: now young people are interested in obtaining serious knowledge, a demanded specialty.
Everyone understands perfectly well that the education they are now receiving is the tool that will help them in life, give them the opportunity to get an interesting and well-paid job.
Does Polytech provide such education?
Undoubtedly. Our graduates are in great demand – both in Russia and abroad, they are literally being hunted for.
Many strong corporations have been following our students since 3-4 years of age, watching how the guys are developing, what scientific work they do, what results they achieve.
We have 10-15 basic departments at our university, which are supervised by such serious organizations as Gazprom, Rosatom, etc. We see that they constantly monitor the progress of students, they want to take the best, understanding the importance of investing in human resources, in future employees.
The first courses are usually considered the most difficult. Do all the guys meet the level of requirements?
Alas, not all, the dropouts in the 1st and 2nd year are quite serious: not everyone can pass exams in higher mathematics and physics: the requirements for students at the Polytechnic are very high.
How do you assess the level of preparation of modern students?
Compared to those who came to us, say, 10 years ago, today’s applicants and students are better educated, prepared to study in a serious university – after all, Polytech today confidently occupies one of the leading places in the ranking of engineering educational institutions in Russia.
No matter how scolded the Russian school, we see that there are more such children, and this makes us happy.
Nevertheless, there is a perception that the Soviet secondary education system was much stronger than the current one …
The Soviet education system was undoubtedly very strong, one of the best in the world. I believe that her level was focused on gymnasiums, on elite education – and even in the most ordinary schools, children received very serious knowledge, this was taken for granted.
We had good practices, we could move forward, developing exactly them. We didn’t have to be first, second, third – we just needed to be unique.
But, as you know, at some point we decided to turn to the Anglo-Saxon teaching system, and it took a lot of time to understand its structure, to find the “assemblage points”.
As a result, it was possible to create a new Russian educational concept, modern, oriented towards Western models. Now it has already taken root, so it is no longer possible to return to the Soviet school realities.
Is there a difference in the traditions of teaching at the Faculty of Philology of Tavrichesky University from studying at other universities?
We do have some regional differences. For example, our faculty conducts training in such a specialty as translation studies – it is also important for Crimea, where several languages have long been considered native at once: Russian, Ukrainian and Crimean Tatar.
We have developed methods by which dictionaries with equivalents were published to help study the language palette of the Crimea, books for the educational process.
We used to appreciate the language, treat it with care – for us it was a matter of survival
We also have a unique publication “Learning Words Together”, a collective work of our teachers, representing the modern picture of the world in the Crimean context – this is linguistics, literary criticism, methodology and methodology.
Such publications help to develop vocabulary, improve word skills – and all this in the context of our region.
Is this the first book of this format?
The first, and in it we tried to preserve everything that the teachers ourselves once gave us, and to transfer this wealth to our students. I am sure that such publications can be created in all regions – after all, we all have something to be proud of.
And I also want to say that we are used to appreciating the language, treating it with care – for us it was a matter of survival. Crimeans want to speak competently, therefore the language code, stylistics, culture of speech as academic disciplines are included in the programs and are in great demand in higher education.
Your students also contribute to the dissemination of this knowledge …
Undoubtedly. Both in everyday life and in professional life. Many guys go to schools and then bring their classes to us. They arrange days of acquaintance, show schoolchildren how they study at the faculty, what students do. And this continuity is very encouraging.
We are already preparing to create a School for a Young Philologist, a School for a Young Journalist – just for those guys who want to come here to study.
So far, things are not happening as fast as we would like, but we are trying.
In general, we have a lot of work to do – we are getting used to the new space, trying to make up for what has been missed, to adapt to the new formats of modern linguistics and literary studies.
It turns out that the goals are set by adults, and their children are realizing?
Nothing new, it was always in one form or another. Adults broadcast their desires to the child, set their own goals for him: they wanted him to become a lawyer, economist, artist …
In fact, goal-setting should be built from the child himself, from an understanding of his capabilities and strengths.
It is important to understand this and support the child, give him the opportunity to express himself, so that he feels his own importance.
If antigone argument essay tragic hero he shows fine motor skills, for example, knows how to glue the leaves well, then this must be taken into account in the future. If he has vocal abilities and loves to sing, this should also be supported. And there are many such examples.
There is even such a concept as “the voice of a child”, and parents must peer to understand in which direction this voice “sounds”: art, technology, literature, sports …
It is important to understand this and support the child, to give him the opportunity to express himself, so that he feels his own importance and what is called social success.
There is an opinion that a child can be overrated …
I believe that a child cannot be over-praised, in principle, because his possibilities are endless. But there is one important point: you need to praise him not only because he is good and beautiful, but for his own achievements, since in a person’s life they are judged by real results.
In general, it is very important for children that they be listened to and understood not only by adults, but also by their peers.
Today there is a lot of talk about home schooling as an alternative to schools and kindergartens. How relevant do you think this is today?
If you want to isolate a child from society, then you can build an individual education system and not take him to kindergarten or classes. But if you want a person to be able to communicate with other people and feel comfortable, then he really needs a kindergarten.
As I said, socialization is very important: a person lives in society, he must interact with other people, children have a need to communicate with their peers.